February 14, 2016

OPINION: Kiegerl offers rebuttal to Morris column

Rep. Mike Kiegerl (R-Olathe)

Guest Columnist

The long column by Kansas Senate President Steve Morris in the June 25 paper cannot remain unchallenged , and I’m frankly surprised there was no editorial commentary. Let me therefore comment on his extraordinary attempt to run from his record and to cover those who voted with him in support of  the calamitous budget bill.

I speak for the legislators who acted responsibly and lost the battle in the House to make the state live within its means by two votes. Morris argues that there was no alternate  but to raise taxes. He is entitled to his own opinion but not his own facts, which are as follows:

Starting last fall, the Appropriations Committee met to develop the upcoming budget with the need to address a substantial shortfall in revenues. In this effort, five subcommittees laboriously went through department budgets line by line to see what cost savings were possible. I served on one of these subcommittees and in the aggregate we spent more than 1,000 hours to arrive at a balanced budget without a tax increase.

This was ready by the end of March and Morris never let it come to the Senate floor to be debated. Therefore deliberations were deferred until the week of May 3, the wrap up session which is to last 5 days.

Two days before the end of the term we were presented with a 648-page document containing the budget concocted in secrecy by Morris, our turncoat governor, and a number of so-called Republicans  who supported the “gut and go” maneuver  that removed the budget prepared by the House and inserted an entirely new budget which included the tax increase.We never had a chance to debate our bill. After nine hours of debate of the Parkinson/Morris proposal, that bill was adopted by a two vote margin.

Morris states that critical programs would be in jeopardy were there to be further cuts and he cloaks his argument that K-12, law enforcement, corrections and social services were threatened.In other words we had to raise taxes for the children, the old people and for education. This is absolutely false. There  were increases for each of these areas in the House budget. We restored the 10 percent Medicaid cut, and at my insistence added $6.9 million to reduce the shameful  wait list for disabled kids. This is not enough, and I battled on the floor in vain to add another $8 million to eliminate it altogether. Public safety and corrections also got more funding as did education. We  even restored $82 million of the $170 million in one-time federal funds which were not available this year.

There was some pain in our bill. It required a hiring freeze for the state government ,a 5 percent pay cut for some government employees ,the sale of public property, deferment of some spending and more cuts in the departments not mentioned above.But we would not have burdened our citizens with a higher cost of living.

Morris calls an 18 percent increase in the sales tax “modest.” Perhaps he can explain this perception  to the average Kansas family which will need to pay $30 a month more starting next week. I don’t buy it, if you have a house and car payment just add another $360 a year to your obligations. I also don”t believe that this tax will sunset in three years. While I won’t be in the legislature in three years to vote for elimination, our record is dismal on sunsets.

Morris misrepresents the economic consequences of the bill he helped pass. It will make Kansas less competitive. We already have higher total taxes than all the surrounding states, except for Nebraska. Our unemployment will increase substantially.

One study demonstrates that 20,000 jobs will be lost in the first year alone. And it will slow the recovery. Raising taxes in a recession is toxic,  but Morris insists this sets the ground work for increased economic growth. Hogwash

It is no surprise that those who foisted this economic burden on us are looking for excuses to explain their vote. Many have heard from their constituents. Many “Republicans” who supported the tax increase have primary opponents and they’re running scared.

Morris accuses those of us who fought his economic folly as spreading false and misleading information, but the facts are there for anyone to see: It is the tax and spenders who must bend the truth to score political points.


  1. Jack Burden says:

    Representative Kiegerl you had me for much of your rebuttal, but you lost me in the last few paragraphs.
    You say unemployment will increase by 20,000 lost jobs, and you reference a study, but not which study. This is a far right conservative tactic meant to scare the feces out of folks. I don’t doubt this study exists, but I wonder where it came from and I would appreciate to see the claim in the context of the study. You also attempt to distance yourself from the members of your own party … the House is 61% GOP and the Senate is 78% GOP, so Republican lawmakers did this to us, so don’t try to absolve the Grand Old Party by labeling some of it’s members .
    I’m ok with a hiring freeze, wage reductions (or furloughs), looking for more cuts and deferring spending. I don’t know if I’m on board with selling public property though, I guess it would depend on the situation.
    I’m glad you’re battling a tax increase tooth and nail. I’m glad your trying to get others to think outside the box, however, unless your willing to switch your party affiliation (to libertarian, not democrat), you and your GOP cohorts better own this tax increase. You will all own it at election time whether you want to or not.

  2. Well, Kiegerl, you know how the people feel now when we have to live with local governments that deal in secrecy, make the numerous deals behind closed doors in back rooms, give away all of our tax revenue to the special interests and then hand the people the bill. You, Mr. Kiegerl, have been a part of this environment for years but I certainly know you will never own up to it. However, it does my heart good to know the long arm of cronyism government has had an affect on you too – you reap what you sow.

  3. ThePatriot says:

    Giving Mr. Keigerl’s track record with facts, either the “20,000 lost jobs” study does not exist or it is such shoddy work that he did not want to cite it.

  4. I agree with most of what you say; however, how can you justify voting for a smoking ban that will decrease sales tax revenue and denies people their property rights? And how can you increase bureaucracy by increasing daycare regulations (and all the subsequent overhead needed) on in home providers? You talk the talk, but you’re only halfway walking it.

Comments do not necessarily reflect those of The Gardner News, or staff. By posting, commentators assume all liability. Please contact webmaster to report comments that infringe on copyrights, or are of a profane or libelous nature. Webmaster reserves the right to edit or remove content deemed offensive.


Speak Your Mind