September 1, 2014

EDITORIAL: Waverly Pointe residents should be careful with objections

Waverly Pointe residents should approach their opposition to a proposed apartment complex in their neighborhood carefully.

More than 50 residents packed Gardner City Council chambers on Oct. 4 to voice their opposition to project that would see up to 48 apartments in three buildings constructed in their subdivision.

Many of the residents’ reasoning smacked of snobbery, and that’s certainly not the tone our community should project to the outside world.

From fears that it would make our school district look ghetto compared to our new rivals in the Eastern Kansas League to claims that parents in the apartment buildings would let their dirty kids run wild in the streets, it sounded like tripe from elitists.

Everyone can understand the residents’ desire to protect what is likely their largest investment – their homes – but there’s a way to give voice to those concerns without sounding like Paris Hilton forced to sleep on a lumpy bed.

It would be wise for the group to agree on one or two spokespeople who can be cautious and thoughtful in their wording. Several residents gave voice to their concerns in just such a manner citing concerns about renters versus home owners rather than concerns about how much the potential residents earned. Their arguments sounded well-reasoned and well-mannered.

We are not arguing that there isn’t cause for concern from such a proposed development. There is reason for alarm – especially since Waverly Pointe residents were mislead about exactly what kind of housing would eventually border their properties.

And we, too, worry about a large new number of transient residents with no long-term plans to call this community home. However, in the next few years, if projections are to be believed – the intermodal will bring 7,000 new jobs to this area. The majority of those jobs will pay between $9 and $12 per hour.

That’s a salary of less than $25,000. With two working adults, that’s less than $50,000 in one household. The median income in Johnson County is approximately $72,000, and the proposed apartment buildings would limit residents to incomes no more than 60 percent of the median household income in the county – about what two working adults at new intermodal jobs would earn.

If those jobs are all people new to town, they’re going to need to live somewhere. And that somewhere will be in someone’s backyard. We need to have these debates cautiously and carefully, so our new residents feel as welcome as Waverly Pointe residents did when they first moved to town.

Comments

  1. Jerry L Kellogg Sr says:

    Gardner City Council Special Meeting October 9, 2010

    The Gardner City Council will hold a Special Meeting on Saturday, October 9, 2010 at 9:30 am to discuss Community Vision. This Special Meeting will take place at:

    KU Edwards Campus
    12600 Quivira Road
    Overland Park, KS 66213
    Regnier Hall, Room 152

  2. Alittle off the main subject but if the median is $72,000.00 Multi Services needs to adjust income guideliness. That is alot more than the minimum to get help when in need. As a private crisis resource ministry I have heard from many who make around $55,000.00 to 60 be turned down for food and assistance with utlities with 3 children. These are working individuals some living here since birth and now have children of their own. We have helped many, with friends assistance, to give a small hand of help to those refused help from local agencies. I still say why is there two sides? We have homeless children. Many you would not look at and believe they had no home. Not all income restricted tenants are only here for awhile many have been here for 30 plus years. I will never change my opinion, who am I to say no to a home for someone else. Your current neighbors are human too and tomorrow you could need an income restricted home, do not judge.

    Multi Services Guidelines From our research to get help for others Catholic Charties are income restricted too and around the same as below.

    Below is 150% what they often use..
    Household Size Gross Annual Income Gross Monthly Income
    1 $15,600 $1,300
    2 $21,000 $1,750
    3 $26,400 $2,200
    4 $31,800 $2,650
    5 $37,200 $3,100
    6 $42,600 $3,550
    7 $48,000 $4,000
    8 $53,400 $4,450

    listed on web site at 200%

    $71,200 a year $5,933 and monthly is for a family of 8

    Keep in mind this is Gross! not net… so this does not take in account health insurance dental vision etc… and all the taxes

    Maybe a new story I would love to read your thoughts and research on.

    But I do like this article much better than the last on this subject. Great work on this one. As usual sorry for any typos not proofing it is late.

    http://hsa.jocogov.org/outreach/income.shtml shows 2008/2009 but they still use them….

Comments do not necessarily reflect those of The Gardner News, or staff. By posting, commentators assume all liability. Please contact webmaster to report comments that infringe on copyrights, or are of a profane or libelous nature. Webmaster reserves the right to edit or remove content deemed offensive.


 

Speak Your Mind