February 9, 2016

EDITORIAL: Mill increase irresponsible in current economic conditions

Gardner residents should wrap a tight fist around their wallets, because city officials will be requiring an extra chunk of it soon. City council members approved a 6.5 mill increase at a meeting on Aug. 9.

The increase may have come as a surprise to those who follow city politics carefully. After several weeks of discussion, council members seemed poised to increase the tax rate by 4.5 mills rather than 6.5. Ironically, the lone vote against the higher tax increase came from the one person on the council who was elected. The remaining four members are all Mayor Dave Drovetta appointees.

City officials tried to cushion the blow of raising taxes in a recession by noting that property values decreased over the course of last year.

The numbers tell a slightly different story.

While appraised property values decreased by approximately 4 percent countywide last year, the 6.5 mill increase represents more than a 25 percent property tax increase for Gardner citizens.

Although the list of governing bodies reaching farther into citizens’ pockets is dramatic, there are shining examples in which taxes have been lowered or at a minimum, remained stagnant. The leadership of such places – which includes the city and school board in Spring Hill and Johnson County officials – deserve great praise not only for their current leadership, but for the leadership in years past that allowed the current governing bodies to be in a position to hold the taxing line. Their leadership shows true character.
We wish we could say the same for Gardner. Unfortunately, the city put itself in the position of having few options. Last year, the city faced a similar deficit and refused to cut staff. They tried to exist by simply holding the line on maintenance and expansion projects. Sadly, those were one-time expenditures with little lasting impact on the budget. In order to realize long-term cost benefits, the city and governments in general, need to carefully consider staffing cuts. Had the reduction in force the Gardner officials initiated a few months before this budget season been implemented when first suggested last summer, the city likely would not have the budget hole that required a dramatic tax increase this year.

City officials are also promising that this mill increase will be reduced by 2017. No one should buy that story. It’s a rare, rare day indeed when governing bodies reduce taxes. A perfect example is the pool and park half cent sales tax. That tax is set to sunset soon, and as recently as January, the Mayor told Chamber of Commerce members at a luncheon that he’d like to see that sales tax extended to pay for roads or other needs.

Gardner residents should expect city officials to budget for the city as they would for their own businesses or their own families. Unless our council members are swimming up stream in massive amounts of debt, that doesn’t appear to be the case.


  1. Driveway or container tax sounds better all the time, especially to this community where the warehouses and the intermodal will be bringing trucks by the boatload. Let those who create costs pay for them. Several years ago, I proposed that the new interchange be paid by those who will use it – those trucks could have a sensor on their front bumpers and everytime they went thru the interchange, a charge would be created and they would get the monthly bill.

    The infrastructure costs for that project will be in the billions and will never end. Serious thought should have been given to that fact prior to the worthless politicians cramming the project down the throuts of average citizens but now it will be an absolute necessity. How will those infrastructure costs be paid and who will be doing the paying and how? Will just love to hear the worthless politicians discussing that important issue in the years to come – that and the terrible pollution and accompanying costs we will be suffering.

    You should realize more than ever that it is important you vote and your vote does have consequences.

  2. Where did the Chamber weigh in on the increase? The increase will hit commercial properties hard; especially in a poor economy when many are barely making it. It’s no surprise this council moved to increase taxes – and utilities – they answer to staff as opposed to residents.

Comments do not necessarily reflect those of The Gardner News, or staff. By posting, commentators assume all liability. Please contact webmaster to report comments that infringe on copyrights, or are of a profane or libelous nature. Webmaster reserves the right to edit or remove content deemed offensive.


Speak Your Mind