February 11, 2016

Censure movement about theatrics rather than common sense

Danedri Thompson
Guest Columnist
The appropriate way to remove people from office is at the ballot box – not in a three-ring circus that serves as an echo chamber of egos.
Unfortunately, that’s not how a loud minority of people in Gardner like to do things. They’d sooner usurp the voters in a bid to pump their own egos than wait until the next election. At least, that’s how it seems to this voter.
In 2011, Fotovich received 13 percent of the votes in his bid for city council. Fotovich’s 446 votes were fewer than Dennis Pugh’s, who also earned a spot on the council in that election. When Pugh followed Fotovich home and physically assaulted him, few people could be bothered to come to a council meeting and wax poetic about things like integrity and morality.
Instead, I watched as people on social media said things like “Larry deserved it.” Some of the people saying that are the very same people who on social media today are demanding Fotovich leave office.
Fotovich is mouthy, and he never lets anything go. It’s frustrating to witness and probably even more exasperating to be on the other side of it.
That said, I voted for him in 2011 knowing exactly what to expect of him. He makes meetings longer, because he asks a lot of questions. Most – not all – but most are questions that should be asked. He asks things like, how much money will we spend in interest? Should we purchase outright instead of leasing? He asks why don’t we lower the hotel tax to make Gardner more competitive with Olathe, instead of increasing our hotel tax to their rate?
The hotel tax debate was Fotovich’s finest moment. After the council passed its annual budget, council member Heath Freeman suggested that Gardner’s hotel tax rate lags behind some of our neighboring cities. Back in August when Freeman suggested the tax hike, Gardner’s transient tax rate was 6 percent. Thanks to that vote, Gardner’s hotel tax rate is now higher than guest tax rates in Olathe, Shawnee, De Soto and Merriam,  Spring Hill and Bonner Springs . Our 8 percent rate now matches that of Lenexa and Leawood.
When Freeman made his suggestion in August 2013, so-called conservative members of the council  agreed to raise the tax, saying it’s not Gardner residents who pay it. Council member Steve Shute said it’s often businesses who pay it.
Fotovich suggested lowering or eliminating the tax in the hopes that the rate would create an economic competitive advantage and lure additional hotels to the city.
“To me, the greater goal would be to decrease the tax,” Fotovich said. “The best way to increase the consumption is to lower the price.”
Fotovich was the sole council member to oppose the tax hike.
“I don’t see how anyone can get excited about a tax even if it’s a tax on someone else,” Fotovich said.
Fotovich got it right, even without meeting with constituents or reading up on tax hikes on social media. His miserly ways are inherent. He doesn’t need someone whispering in his ear that tax hikes aren’t a good thing.
The same can’t be said for others on the council. It appears, many take their cues from the loudest minority instead of the silent, steadfast majority. This community is a conservative one, but on the most basic, conservative ideal – keeping taxes low to stimulate growth – only one council member could be counted on to vote correctly. And that council member is Larry Fotovich.
I have no faith whatsoever that an appointed replacement council member would do the right thing if that situation were ever to arise again.
We currently have council members who pay lip service to conservative ideals , and only one who actually voted that way.
Those rallying to discipline Fotovich appear more interested in theatrics than common sense. For example, Fotovich  naysayers told me anyone who owns a house outside of Gardner should resign.
That’s ludicrous and shows a complete lack of reasoning. There are plenty of people who own property outside of Gardner city limits who are voters and members of this community. I can count myself among them. My husband and I own a rental property in Olathe and land just beyond city limits. One day, I hope we own a cabin in the mountains and a condo in Hawaii. My voter registration will likely remain in Gardner.
Another person suggested I should drive to his house right now. This was during a council meeting. The person said that if I did, I would see that there aren’t any lights on at his Gardner house.
There weren’t any lights on in my Gardner house at the time either. I was at a council meeting. I turned the lights off to conserve energy.
Meanwhile, the Fotovich protesters presented a petition signed by some legitimate names. But other signatories included, “Me So Horny.” Me So Horny probably isn’t a registered Gardner voter.
Thesame people who presented to council a photo of Fotovich standing in front of a barbecue grill with several other men as evidence that he doesn’t live in Gardner. There is no time or date stamp on the photo they presented nor is there any hint of where that photo was taken. If it was taken in Olathe or North Dakota, a photograph of someone in a different location doesn’t prove they live there. I have dozens of photos of me at the Eiffel Tower.. Sadly, I don’t live in Paris.
The people demanding Fotovich resign complained that his presence on the council creates a distraction. I would argue their eye rolling, heavy sighs and snide comments during council meetings create the greater distraction.
I am writing about my support of Fotovich so that we can put to rest the idea that there’s an overwhelming majority of citizens who wish him to leave.
I can’t say for certain how the numbers stand, but he was duly elected by Gardner voters. And those numbers don’t lie.
I’m not looking forward to the day when Gardner, once again, has a majority of appointed council members. Several of the last appointees, with the exception of council member Tory Roberts, never even bothered to vote in city elections prior to their appointments to the council.
The entire episode to throw Fotovich out of office appears to have been  based solely on personalities and political theater.
I voted for Fotovich in 2011, because I trusted his judgment then. I don’t always agree with him, but I continue to trust his judgment today.


  1. Rich Melton says:

    “In 2011, Fotovich received 13 percent of the votes in his bid for city council.” At the time Councilman Fotovich received these votes there was no doubt about his living in Gardner. You failed to point out in your story that Councilman Fotovich has not answered e-mails from constituents on his plans for the future. As I pointed out in the meeting on Monday night, it is Councilman Fotovich’s own fault that more and more people believe he is doing something unethical by his own actions. As an example I have been attending the meetings for moths bringing this problem to light. Councilman Fotovich has yet to even come up to me and explain his plan or plans. I know he has told others it is none of their business. This could have been easily resolved by the councilman himself if he truly has nothing to hide. I believe that you told me at one time that Councilman Fotovich had told you his intentions, that must be nice. Please share them with the rest of us. A few weeks ago you yourself stood in front of council and the Mayor and lambasted them for not asking Councilman Fotovich what his intentions are. Yet you never asked council if they had. I think you need to go back and ask them about that, you will find that several of them got the same answer or worse than the citizens e-mailing him.

    As for owning property in an other city, you must have forgotten that he bought another home in Olathe and his home in Gardner is for sale. That in its self shows he has the intent on moving.

    I am unsure of what Dennis Pugh has to do with this topic short of him resigning. I will agree no one showed up to ask for his resignation because he did it on his OWN! That is what people with morals and ethics due.

    I will also agree that this council has not done things the way I would like them as a conservative. That being said that is why we have elections. I find it ironic that now that people are starting to get involved in the process (some for the first time) you find the need to badger them because they did not do it before. Sometimes it takes a real problem for people to wake up and see that things are not right.

    I will leave you with this thought, what would Councilman Fotovich say if it were any other council person in this situation? He would be demanding they step down.

  2. Alan Carter says:

    My personal favorite moment came at 9:18 in video #8 where Larry kept running his mouth pointlessly when it was already clear the motion would be withdrawn. When asked if he wanted to continue to exercise his ego by talking, under the promise of actually being subjected to a trail proceeding as outlined in Roberts Rules of Order, he finally stopped talking and remained silent without any answer. It was gratifying after this farce to actually see him mute- of course when he was actually faced with a decision about real consequences the true lack of depth of his courage was revealed. Perhaps if he would practice this skill a bit more he might have a bit more support from the rest of the Council.

Comments do not necessarily reflect those of The Gardner News, or staff. By posting, commentators assume all liability. Please contact webmaster to report comments that infringe on copyrights, or are of a profane or libelous nature. Webmaster reserves the right to edit or remove content deemed offensive.


Speak Your Mind