February 10, 2016

250 percent jump in accidents on 175th Street

Amy Cunningham

With an increase in the city’s population and the number of traffic accidents, some residents in Gardner have called for a reevaluation of heavily traveled thoroughfares in town. For some, the December 2010 two-car accident which cost the lives of Hannah Apperson and Milton Whaley highlighted the importance of making U.S. 56 Highway west of Interstate 35 and east of Moonlight Road safer.

Gardner city engineer Celia Duran said the city received a number of inquiries and suggestions for improvements to the highway following the December crash.

“I know when the fatality accident occurred last year we had a number of residents calling to ask about lowering the speed limit (in that area) and we forwarded that information along to KDOT. There were various (safety) recommendations made by the citizens,” Duran recalled.

Based on numbers from the city, Gardner’s population doubled between 2000 and 2010, the number of accidents occurring on that stretch of road increased 250 percent. In 2000, that area saw 18 accidents, none fatal.  In 2005 the number of incidents reached 24, but none of those wrecks resulted in fatalities.  By 2010 there were 45 reported accidents with one accident resulting in two fatalities.

According to Duran, the city’s master plan shows traffic counts on 56 Highway will increase exponentially.

“Based on the transportation master plan, it shows about 19,000 cars per day travel on 56 (Highway) east of Moonlight.  West of Cedar Niles it shows about 26,320 cars. Those are existing numbers based on 2008,” said Duran. “By 2015 we’re estimating east of Moonlight 23,500 cars (per day) and west of Cedar Niles about 33,000.”

Gardner Police Department Information Officer Ilena Spalding said that the department keeps incident records and tries to monitor when a location becomes more accident prone.  She said if the department notices a spike in the number of traffic accidents they notify the city. They also step up patrols in the area.

“We work closely with the city engineer but ultimately (making changes to that road) is left up to the state of Kansas because that is a U.S. Highway,” Spalding explained.  “Main Street is our Main Street, but that is also U.S. 56 Highway, and it is part of the state of Kansas.”

Duran said the city of Gardner has been working closely with the state in regards to the safety concerns related to that part of the highway. That stretch of road is monitored by three entities: the city of Gardner, Johnson County and the state of Kansas.  All three groups conduct a study each year to examine traffic counts in the area.  The city also makes the Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) aware of the number of traffic incidents.  She said the city has created a database to monitor accidents, and has been working on the U.S. 56 Highway Corridor Management Plan in conjunction with KDOT.  Findings from the plan did not show any major alarming statistics proving immediate action needs to be taken. However, because of the city’s intimate knowledge of the area, she said that the city did hope to have a discussion  with the state about the speed limit.  They also wanted to look at the intersection of Cedar Niles Road and U.S. 56 Highway where more than 50 percent of the accidents in 2010 occurred.

For their part, in response to the Dec., 2010 accident, KDOT is in the process of completing a traffic study on the one-and-a-half-mile stretch of road on U.S. 56 Highway between the east terminal of I-35 and Aspen Street. According to Kim Qualls, KDOT spokesperson, the study will look at a variety of factors. Some of those include crash history for the area, the geometry of the roadway, what types of crashes have occurred, what the vehicle’s movements (have been), the conditions of the roadway (in relation to wrecks), the speed limit through that area and the actual speed that driver’s drive.

Findings in the report could lead the department to make changes to the area.

“It’s being reviewed because we’ve received more information,” Qualls explained.  “We’re waiting for finalized traffic study that will tell us any recommendations needed on that stretch of roadway.”

In the meantime, the city has made policy changes – for example increasing patrols of the area.

In addition to stepping up patrols, Duran explained that city staff is preparing to propose to the Gardner City Council a plan that would have developers on the hook for increased traffic caused by their developments.

“What we’re trying to propose to council is that when developers come in, we’d like them to pay for a traffic study that would measure the impact of their development and pay for the traffic improvements (that would be needed). We call that Access Management Guidelines.”

From the city’s point of view, the ball rests in KDOT’s court.

“There are federal guidelines that (KDOT) has to follow,” Duran stated.  “We like to work with them, but they have these guidelines to follow. We express our concern, but we have to work with them to come up with a solution.If there is something that is unsafe we would support any recommendation to make it safer for the public.”


  1. Related to stoplights? says:

    I would be interested in seeing how that 250% increase in accidents was distributed with regards to the construction and the new stoplight they put in on Old 56 highway. Did the number of accidents increase or decrease with that stoplight? I would not be surprised to find that the accidents DID increase, even if they occurred further down the road at Cedar Niles. Whereas before, the traffic had time to spread out at least a little bit, now the Old 56 light stacks up even more traffic, all of it out of time from both the Moonlight AND Cedar Niles lights.

    Stoplights, especially unsynchronized ones like the one they added at Old 56, only serve to stack traffic up, adding to congestion instead of reducing it. Speed can certainly be an issue, but congestion is by leading factor behind the majority of traffic accidents. Before they start taking blind guesses, like a knee-jerk reduction in speed limits, at how to reduce the number of accidents, they really need to look into finding ways of reducing congestion and allowing traffic to flow as freely as possible between the I-35 exit and the rest of Gardner.

  2. Jerry L Kellogg Sr says:

    The 2008 Kansas Department of Transportation Traffic Accident Fact Book, the most current set of complete statistics available, reveals these interesting figures:

    • 95.8% Accident vehicle occupants birth to 3 years old were in a child seat
    • 93.2% Accident vehicle occupants 4-13 years old were restrained
    • 87.3% All accident vehicle occupants used some type of restraint
    • 81.4% Kansas accidents occur during good weather (no rain, wind, snow, ice, sleet, hail, fog, smoke)
    • 64.8% Reduction in injury accident rate in 30 years (1978-2008)
    • 61.1% Accidents occur during daylight
    • 58.6% Reduction in fatality accident rate in 30 years (1978-2008)
    • 50.0% Reduction in overall accident rate in 30 years (1978-2008)
    • 29.5% Accidents occur during the hours 3:00pm-7:00pm
    • 19.8% Accidents happen at intersections
    • 11.4% Accidents “intersection-related” (traffic slowing or backed up from an intersection)
    • 8.4% Occur between 5:00-5:59pm (most dangerous hour of the day)
    • 5.6% Involve heavy and/or large trucks
    • 2.6% Occur in Work Zones
    • 0.0038% Involve school, transit or cross country buses

    The Traffic Accident Report that I obtained from the Johnson County Sheriff’s Department last week for the recent double-fatality accident that occurred on the western approach to the US56 Bridge over New Century Parkway, reported the following facts:

    • December 8, 2010 date of accident (December statistically has the most accidents)
    • 5:08pm (daylight – sunset was 5:57pm that day)
    • Westbound pickup truck crossed centerline and collided head-on with eastbound passenger car
    • 1/10th mile east of junction with Old US56 Hwy
    • Accident location was coded non-intersection, no traffic signals
    • Coded not in a Work Zone
    • Undivided 4-lane highway (no center median barrier)
    • Curved roadway on incline/slope
    • 55-mph speed limit
    • Dry concrete pavement with center and edge lines visible
    • No adverse weather conditions

    Interestingly to me, it was not mentioned in the report that there exists a “40-mph reduced speed ahead” sign near the accident scene.

  3. I believe the speed limit on 175 St./Hwy 56 should be reduced to 40 MPH all the way to the I-35 Interchange. Hopefully this would reduce or eliminate fatality accidents. I still don’t like that stretch of road because of having no median but I think reducing that speed limit would help overall. This will be needed even more when all of the intermodal/warehouse trucks start appearing and there are going to be millions of them a year in the years to come. That road will become more dangerous as time goes by until major changes are made and we certainly don’t have the money for it, especially when the big boys don’t want to pay their fair share for anything.

Comments do not necessarily reflect those of The Gardner News, or staff. By posting, commentators assume all liability. Please contact webmaster to report comments that infringe on copyrights, or are of a profane or libelous nature. Webmaster reserves the right to edit or remove content deemed offensive.


Speak Your Mind